Sunday, 21 September 2014

Indefinitely Inked, The Stigmatism That Haunts Those With Tattoos

Since the time when tattoos were first created, there has been a certain stigmatism attached to them and those who have tattoos that not very many understand. It has only been in the last decade, that researchers and others have taken an interest in the history and motives behind tattoos.

History:
            Tattoos date all the way back to the Bronze age, with warriors placing dirt in wounds to stop the bleeding and the wound would heal with dirt still inside making a different colour appear permanently on the body. However back in those time, the “tattoo” was seen as a mark of honour, as the warrior fought bravely for their leader. This type of tattoo (for honour) was brought over to Canada, when soldiers would come back from war, and wanted to commemorate their fallen comrades.

            The very first precursor of the type of tattoo shop we see in today’s society was located in New York to "tat" Civil War officers. This included the first electric tattoo machine that was developed in 1891. Up to this point, the craft of tattooing has been tormented in present day society via unfair generalizations and stereotypes. Every circus had at least one tattooed person, and it was quite common with sailors back in the day. Traditional designs such as hearts and ships were actually popular with sailors. On the other hand, lately, tattoos have picked up standard ubiquity and are commonplace to the point that they probably won't have such a negative undertone. Notwithstanding, techniques for tattoo removal still remain.

Karl Marx and Alienation:

            In 1867, Karl Marx acquired this anthropological wording to depict a sensation he broadly entitled 'fetishism of commodities. Fetishism of Commodities is the state of associations in a capitalist market, in which items are seen as products; substances having a natural quality, while actually their worth is made by human work and labour. Marx contended that this perplexity of items bears incredible similitude to the religious convictions of primitive social orders, in which protests delivered by human work show up as autonomous creatures blessed with life. This view of things rose in the late 19th century against the foundation of the late Industrial Revolution; the ascent of mass mechanical creation and fast appropriation disengaged the merchandise from their makers, or, in Marx's terms, prompted "alienation”.

            In short, this is saying that Alienation is the transformation of people’s own labour into a power, which rules them as if by a kind of natural or supra-human law.

            In this blog we will try to use Karl Marx’s theory of Fetishism of Commodities and Alienations to explain the factors motivating so many people to get tattoos, when parts of society still stigmatism them as something only delinquents get. In Marx’s theory of alienation, he says that an individual that has been alienated do not expand freely upon his bodily and psychological energy but instead modifies and mortifies his body and mind. Tattooing can be seen as one such embarrassment of the body. Additionally alienated people no more end up; worth through their occupations, tattooing might be seen as an inventive outlet used to build a feeling of character.

Today’s Society

            In today’s society, even though tattoos are more common, the tattoo continues to be viewed as a sign of the bearer's alienation from what people consider the mainstream norms and social networks. People see tattoos as permanent scarring on a body that should only be modified for beauty’s sake, not for emotional need. It is seen as a voluntary stigma that symbolically isolates the bearer from "normal people”. Since tattoos are deemed to be responsible for their deviant physical condition, the mark is especially discrediting.

No comments:

Post a Comment